Reading time: ~8 min read
There is one very important fact that needs to be known about the lie that is Darwinism: Darwinism has to date offered no rational scientific answer to the question of how the first living thing appeared. It is unclear how that fictitious "first cell," which Darwinists regard as the origin of all, or even the first protein inside it could have emerged. The theory of evolution has totally collapsed in the face of a single protein whose origin it is unable to account for.
This fact is well known to all Darwinists. That is why they try to gloss it over or make you forget about it in every Darwinist report or program you read or watch. It is impossible to learn from anywhere that engages in Darwinist propaganda that there is zero possibility of a protein forming by chance, that the countless experiments performed over the history of science show that have been unable to produce a single cell protein or a single organelle, and that the structure of the cell is too flawless and irreducibly complex to be able to come into being by chance because these facts demolish the simplistic and unscientific Darwinist account of the origin of life. Bearing in mind that chance cannot even account for the amino acids inside a protein, the theory of evolution's fictitious formula "time + chance + muddy water" is reminiscent of the titles of books of fairy tales written for primary schools.
Scientific writer Hank Hanegraaff summarizes the probability calculations regarding a single protein molecule as follows:
The probability of a single protein molecule being arranged by chance is 1 in 10161, using all atoms on earth and allowing all the time since the world began... for a minimum set of the required 239 protein molecules for the smallest theoretical life the probability is 1 in 10119,879. ıt would take 10119,841 years on the average to get a set of such proteins. That is 10119,831 times the assumed age of the earth and is a figure with 119,831 zeroes.133
Hanegraaff goes on:
If however, a protein molecule is eventually formed by chance forming the second one would be infinitely more difficult. As you can see the signs of the statistical probability demonstrates conclusively that forming a protein molecule by random processes is not only improbable; it is impossible.134
As we have already set out, other proteins need to be in existence for a protein to form. So Darwinists are trapped in a terrible vicious circle and at a complete dead-end. In order to account for the existence of a single protein they would have to account for up to 100 different proteins, DNA and even the cell as a whole. Darwinism is in a state of absolute defeat on this subject.
Yet even assuming that all these things actually happened, that the Darwinist magical formula really works and that the fictitious first cell actually formed (which is scientifically impossible), Darwinists are still in an insoluble predicament. Darwinists have to account for each one of the tasks undertaken by the organelles in a cell, the work done in the body by an enzyme, the emergence and functioning of such complex organs as the liver, spleen, stomach, lungs and brain and, even more importantly, how all these came into being in an immaculate and flawless way through a transition from other living things. But, inevitably, Darwinists never address such matters, let alone explain them.
Because it is impossible to account for the wondrous complexity in all organisms, from the smallest to the very largest, in terms of false Darwinist mechanisms. In fact, all Darwinists are well aware that there is a manifest miracle in the Earth and sky and in the creation of man and all living things. Darwinists themselves know perfectly well that using their own deceptive methods, they can never account for a fertilized cell dividing and producing a human body consisting of 100 trillion cells, of 30 trillion of these specializing in such a way as to constitute the human brain, of the way 12 billion brain cells begin working in a perfect manner by constructing 120 connections between them and, as a result of all this, the emergence of an immaculate living thing.
Science writer and journalist Fred Heeren sets out this reality before Darwinists' very eyes as follows:
This self-evident truth is the simple, rational deduction that all we see is an effect which demands a very great, supernatural Cause. The Sun and the stars, the Moon and this Earth could not have come from nothing. That's irrational- not just to the western mind but to the human mind. Every phenomenon in the universe can be explained in terms of something else that caused it. But the phenomenon in question is the existence of the universe itself, there is nothing in the universe to explain it. No natural explanation.135
There is no doubt that it is Almighty Allah who created and rules over the entire universe, the Earth and sky and all living things. The order that Allah has created within a single cell is so complex that it cannot even be explained in terms of human ability, capacity and intelligence, let alone by chance.
This fact represents one of greatest quandaries facing Darwinism. Since Darwinists have no account to offer on this subject, they generally adopt a policy of "glossing over it." They list the false mechanisms of the theory of evolution, but have nothing to say as to how these supposedly produced evolution. The theory of evolution has suffocated in its own descriptions, but they try to keep that fact from their readers. Yet as can be seen from the following admissions by the evolutionary biologist and atheist Richard Dawkins, Darwinists are perfectly well aware of the insuperable fundamental problems facing evolution:
Nature does not have the foresight to put together a sequence of mutations which, for all that they may entail temporary disadvantage, set a lineage on the road to ultimate global superiority.136
A lineage that moves from a terrestrial to an aquatic existence is likely to need changes to its locomotory system and its respiratory system, and there is no obvious reason to expect any intrinsic connection between them. Why should trends that convert walking limbs to flippers be intrinsically correlated with trends to boost the efficiency of the lungs in extracting oxygen? Of course it is possible that two such co-adapted trends might be correlated as an incidental consequence of embryological mechanisms, but the correlation is no more likely to be positive than negative.137
Even Dawkins, one of today's best known atheists, has to admit that no mechanism of the evolution he so fervently espouses actually represents so-called evolution. By these words, Dawkins has had to say that mutations cannot produce any advantageous result and that the profound changes necessary for a life form to move from water to dry land are impossible. These admissions by Dawkins clearly show how the perverse religion that is Darwinism is so blindly revered despite being bereft of any scientific evidence.
In his book, Dawkins also included a quote on the subject from the Nobel prize-winning immunologist Professor Sir Peter Medawar:
'... We have therefore no convincing account of evolutionary progress...'138
Ignoring fundamental dilemmas may of course have had an effect people with no training on the subject. But the more people learn about the theory of evolution the more they will start to ask questions about certain glossed over facts, details that have been deliberately glossed over and fundamental subjects that have been covered up. That is the current state of affairs in the schools of various countries, in certain states in the USA and in Europe. Students are rejecting blind instruction and have no hesitation over arguing about these fundamental dilemmas with their teachers. The fundamental dilemmas of Darwinism are attracting people's notice, and they are waiting for an explanation of them all. Darwinists' lengthy silence on this issue has even encouraged proponents of Darwinism to doubt it, and people have begun searching for an answer outside Darwinism. Naturally, everyone who is freed from the spell of Darwinism can clearly see that all the wondrously complex life that exhibits intelligence and consciousness was, in fact, created.
Darwinism is at an impasse, because living beings were created, rather than having evolved. People now clearly see this; they accept that fact in their hearts and minds. Allah describes how He is mighty enough to do all things, and that the false gods of Darwinism have no power in His verses:
Mankind! An example has been made, so listen to it carefully. Those whom you call upon besides Allah are not even able to create a single fly, even if they were to join together to do it. And if a fly steals something from them, they cannot get it back. How feeble are both the seeker and the sought!
References
- Hank Hanegraaff, Fatal Flaws "What Evolutionists Don't Want You To Know", W Publishing Group, 2003, p. 52 ↩
- Hank Hanegraaff, Fatal Flaws "What Evolutionists Don't Want You To Know", W Publishing Group, 2003, p. 54 ↩
- Hank Hanegraaff, Fatal Flaws "What Evolutionists Don't Want You To Know", W Publishing Group, 2003, pp. 59-60 (emphasis in original) ↩
- Richard Dawkins, The Extended Phenotype, Oxford University Press, 1999, s. 46 ↩
- Ibid., p. 107 ↩
- Ibid. p. 165 ↩