Reading time: ~7 min read
A secret agreement between Darwinist scientists has been developed in order to enhance the enchantment of Darwinism and to maximize its efficiency as a propaganda tool. With a handful of exceptions, almost everyone stays silent in regard to the illogical, inconsistent, and childish so-called explanations which have been developed in order to defend the Darwinian theory.
Occasionally these explanations become a source of considerable embarrassment to the Darwinists, who might be expected to object to these outlandish claims, but typically abstain from comment out of fear of negative reaction from the rest of their peers. For example, though Charles Darwin claimed that the North American black bear turned into a whale as the result of opening its mouth wide in order to catch insects in the river, or that fish who rose up and turned with the help of their fins became perfectly formed creatures with wings that flew through the air, these bizarre speculations are nowadays disavowed by the vast majority of Darwinists, though a handful of the more traditional Darwinists occasionally espouse them from time to time.124 Finally, in 2009, the fossil known as "Ida" was correctly identified as belonging not to some imaginary human ancestor, but to a lemur. This farce was in the headlines for several weeks, as Ida had been heavily promoted as "the biggest evidence of (imaginary) human evolution", and the "missing link" by Darwinists (who also promoted "Ardi", another so-called ancestor, which turned out to be the fossil remains of a common Bonobo chimpanzee). Some of the Darwinists referred to the Ida fiasco as "antics" or "a circus", and some of them clearly stated they were embarrassed by the whole affair, and that Ida wasn't even close to being a "distant ancestor", much less a (false) missing link.125
Ardi, which was briefly mentioned above, was produced by putting together the fossilized remains of a Bonobo chimpanzee in a fictitious way and made to resemble a human being; this obvious state of affairs evoked almost immediate criticism from some Darwinists. It was admitted in even the most staunchly Darwinist publications that all the claims about Ardi walking upright or being an early ancestor of man were wholly fictitious, and that Ardi bore more resemblance to an ordinary Bonobo chimpanzee, an endangered species which is still found in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The Darwinists had to withdraw yet another of their preposterous claims.126
Generally, the reactions of Darwinists to these frauds is quite feeble. According to their ideology, the simply must defend Darwinism, and its erroneous view that all life is "simple" no matter what; even though it is most obviously patently absurd. According to Darwin, evolution generated such things as black bears turning into whales, a claim which has no validity in any of the sciences. Nonetheless, the followers of Darwin will defend these false ideas to the very end.
D. T. Rosevear from the Inorganic Chemistry Department at Bristol University expresses the simple logic of Darwinism and the scientists who openly engage in this deceptive game;
(Evolution) seems to me a hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts. These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without a murmur of protest.127
Although Darwinists try to ascribe "simplicity" to all the life forms they want, a simple observation of the perfect and amazing complexity of life is a clear reality which they cannot simply ignore or wish away. There are quite literally millions of different species of plants and animals alive today in the world, and even the smallest structures in these plants and animals present this most wondrous complexity imaginable. Today, when scientists can "understand" just the smallest fraction of the complexity of these structures and functions, or discover how they function it is deemed a great achievement. Intelligent human beings didn't even know what their own cells looked like as little as a century ago; and in any event, try though he might, no matter how long a scientist labors over his petri dishes and microscopes, he will never create anything of the like, not even so much one of the hundreds of thousands of proteins. Bacteria, which is typically described by Darwinists as the "simplest" form of life, is in truth an extraordinary model of complexity with its organelles, its DNA, its cell membrane, and its amazing resistance to antibiotics.128 According to Sir James Gray, a bacteria actually does more work than a modern-day laboratory; he says as follows:
Although bacteria are tiny, they display biochemical, structural, and behavioral complexities that outstrip scientific description. In keeping with the current microelectronics revolution, it would make more sense to equate their size with sophistication rather than simplicity. Without bacteria, life on Earth could not exist in its present form.129
In this context, it is impossible to talk about "simplicity" in regard to life. Living organisms all demonstrate the existence and superiority of an outstanding Creator and a Power that is above and inspires all living things. This Creator is Allah, who gives life to all things, who knows the condition of everything which He has created, who has created all things from nothing, the most Glorious. Every unique creation of Allah comes to fruition when He merely commands, "Be!" For Allah, creating the most magnificent creatures whenever and however He wants is undoubtedly very easy. He is the possessor of everything, and he know and judges all things; He is omniscient and omnipresent. Allah informs us in the Qu'ran;
References
- Steve Jones, Darwin's Ghost: The Origin of Species Updated, Random House Publisher, 2000, p. xvii, xviii ↩
- Hank Hanegraaff, Fatal Flaws "What Evolutionists Don't Want You To Know", W Publishing Group, 2003, p. 26 ↩
- Katherine Harmon, How Humanlike Was "Ardi"?, Scientific American, 19 November 2009,http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-humanlike-was-ardi ↩
- D. T. Rosevear, "Scientist Critical of Evolution", Evolution Protest Movement Pamphlet, no. 224, 1980, p. 4 - Nicholas Comninellis, Creative Defense, Evidence Against Evolution, Master Books, 2001, p. 225 ↩
- Sir James Gray, The Science of Life, chapter in Science Today, 1961, p. 21 ↩
- James A. Shapiro, Bacteria as Multicellular Organisms, Scientific American , Vol. 258, Haziran 1998, p. 82 ↩